During its cultural Season, the National Library and Archives sheds light on artificial intelligence and its applications in the realm of digital archiving and the modern media industry.
Recently, the National Library and Archives hosted a seminar titled “Digital Media and Artificial Intelligence: Archiving the Present and Shaping the Future”, which was the concluding event of its Cultural Season 2024. It focused on technological advancement as a crucial factor in fostering creativity and innovation within media and archiving. Additionally, it highlighted the vital role of AI in shaping the future of digital media, and the importance of media in recording, archiving, and ensuring the accessibility and preservation of past and present events for future generations. The seminar also examined advantages and disadvantages of AI in media archiving.

The seminar, presented by media pioneer Abdul Latif Al-Sayegh, emphasized the necessity for collaborative efforts between archives and digital media to effectively present, safeguard, and archive documented historical information. The speaker cautioned against allowing major corporations like Google and Meta, with their advanced technologies, to monopolize and control archives. He also urged attendees not to overly rely on the archival data these entities provide, despite their significant financial backing and influence.
The speaker pointed out that AI has begun to grasp human trends and needs, explaining that what appears on electronic search platforms is not by chance. He noted the crucial documentation done by large companies, such as Google Earth Legacy cameras, preserving cultural heritage and offering data which tracks global changes. He also mentioned Google Trends, which reveals public interests, and the remarkable services provided by “Chat GPT” that have become essential references for researchers across various disciplines.

The seminar reflected on the state of archives in the past, the tools once utilized, and the methods for regulating access to necessary documents, contrasting them with the current landscape where archives are readily accessible on media platforms. It addressed the most significant changes that have occurred, supported by examples from the collections of the British Library, the U.S. Library of Congress, and the BBC. It also spotlighted Google (knowledge archive), Meta (social life archive), and Twitter or (X) platform (real-time historical moments).
The seminar highlighted the vast potentials of large corporations that have not only developed communication platforms but have also created digital archives that aid in comprehending both the present and the future. These archives document life as it unfolds, analyse societal behaviours, and impact the evolution of human knowledge.
Furthermore, the symposium examined the effects of artificial intelligence on the creation of digital archives and the organization and categorization of extensive collections. It discussed the interdependent relationships between documenting current events and the global archives that documented history. This led to making everything available on major platforms including those interested in highlighting world cultural heritage.
The importance of government involvement in funding the digitization of archives was emphasized, alongside the encouragement of public participation, a focus on data protection, the documentation of cultural and national heritage, and the support of scientific research and knowledge advancement. The seminar also underscored future prospects for the relationship between digital media and the emerging archiving centres. It shed light on the development of robust national archiving platforms, the advantages of artificial intelligence tools and the benefits that AI offers in media archiving, such as restoring old audio recordings, enhancing images and videos, and recognizing ancient texts, as well as reviving historical figures.
Conversely, the seminar pointed out the drawbacks of utilizing artificial intelligence in media archiving, including the creation of fake videos, the alteration of historical images, misleading audio modifications, disinformation in research, and the fabrication of false historical events. In this respect, the national archives are held accountable for exposing such distortions and misinformation due to their detrimental effects.